Monday, 9 November 2015

Diarrhoea prevalence in East Africa


As mentioned in the previous post ill health and diseases associated with inadequate water supply and sanitation facilities is a momentous concern in Africa and in the rest of the developing world. These illnesses and diseases include that of diarrhoea, which is a fundamental environmental health issue. Drawing from Tumwine et al (2002) I will be exploring the links concerning the prevalence of diarrhoea and the nature of water supplies and sanitation facilities in three countries in East Africa; Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

The literature argues that the type of water source or the nature of the water supplies available to the population in that area affects the prevalence of diarrhoea.

 

 

 


(Tumwine et al 2002)

 

The Graph above displays the household prevalence of diarrhoea by type of water source and as illustrated, the water source resulting in the least prevalence is that of a vendor or kiosk. The water source with the highest prevalence is that of reservoirs or ponds meaning that households that rely on surface water as their primary source of water are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and it is reported that in these circumstances, there was at least one case of diarrhoea in the preceding week after the survey was collected.

 

The form of water source isn’t the only factor that can affect the prevalence of illnesses such as diarrhoea as the type of sanitation facility is also related with diarrhoea morbidity. The results from this study indicate that un-piped households with no sanitation had a prevalence rate of 66%, whereas those with an access to a pit or a ventilated improved privy (VIP) latrine had a much lower prevalence rate of about 20%.

 

Therefore this study exemplifies the importance of the type of water source and the available sanitation facilities in the area, on the prevalence of diarrhoea. Using surface water seems to be the biggest determining factor in causing the illness and this has also been found in other studies such as Manun’ebo et al (1994) whose findings were consistent with those from Tumwine et al (2002).